DOING AWAY WITH
NUCLEAR BOMBS
Today the world has nuclear bombs which can destroy the
world a hundred times over. Maybe the world revived from such a catastrophe
earlier as outlined and compared to similarities in the Hindu epic
‘Mahabaratha’, the ‘Brahma asthra (arrow)’ being the nuclear missile. Most of
the nuclear bombs are held by US, Russia and the European countries. Why they
want to hold so much of an arsenal is intriguing? May be they are expecting an
alien attack from outer space, or they would like to deflect a rogue meteorite!
But as long as they control such an arsenal they are a threat to every single
nation or humans in the world; and this creates the desire of every single
nation to create its own. Today, US sets
the standards of nuclear safety and justifies its own stockpiles and ensures
the right to control others nuclear capabilities. A country which still wonders
as to how its citizens go suddenly crazy and start shooting unarmed innocents
talks about controlling the minds of a few, who directly control these death missiles.
The US don’t seem to realise that if the Japanese and its allies had nuclear
weapons in World war II, they would have let go every single missile they had
and the world would have become the only radioactive planet in the universe.
THE SOLUTION: Let us
calculate the total nuclear payload required to destroy earth, divide it by 100
and distribute this quota to all the countries in the world as per their land
area. The quota would be utilized only when a country adheres to all protocols
of safety agreed to by all countries under the aegis of the UN. The protocols
would also include the following:
1.
The factors which provide stability levels to a
country like economy indicators, social equality parameters, gender equality
standards (female domination in many countries have triggered conjugated male
tyranny), internal strife factors and environmental awareness ( a country who
is loathsome of environmental safety would disregard nuclear safety).
2.
The accessibility for international inspectors
(UN) to any nuclear stockpile area.
3.
The legal framework and the agreeability to
allow any country to submit evidence in the International court of Justice.
Any country which falls short of the above standards would
be asked to hand over control of nuclear assets to the UN body for safe
custody. If refused, the UN should have the capability and power to go in and
forcibly take over. Every country should be made to realise that any nuclear
bomb is the asset of humanity and not their own. They hold custody only to feel
secure against any sudden aggression by a powerful neighbour. As taking over
custody becomes a routine procedure nations will get used to it and ensure all
safety compliance.
With technology and information availability becoming an
unrestricting life factor, nuclear bombs would be made in a jiffy. As long as
unequal factors of owning a nuclear bomb remains, the world would get
increasingly nuclearized. To monitor and control nuclear assets all over the
world as per US desires, it should be prepared to allocate almost 5% of its GDP
(more than today’s Defence budget) for undercover operations, lost businesses
with unhappy countries, warfare and diplomatic wrangles, not to mention the
loss due to internal vigilance due to constant threats (including, living on
emotional edge as evidenced by the new catchword ‘boots on the ground’).
Ref: paddysglobosolutions.blogspot.com / yaugglebooggle.blogspot.com (for interesting reading about the Universes' undiscovered truths and other wordly mysteries).
Note: the above, as far as we can see, is the only solution for avoiding a nuclear annihilation. (my
blog always tries to propose the ultimate solutions).
